Secondhand smoke may damage children’s eyes and possibly lead to problems with sight later in life, new findings suggest. In a study of Chinese children, increasing exposure to secondhand smoke was associated with choroidal thinning, researchers report in JAMA Ophthalmology, October 17. “Secondhand smoking exposure in children is an important public health threat, affecting up to 40% of children,” said study coauthor Jason Yam of The Chinese University of Hong Kong. “Therefore, public health interventions and education should be implemented to ban secondhand smoking exposure in children.”
It’s already known that secondhand smoking is linked with poorer eye health in adults, including age-related macular degeneration, but its impact on children’s eyes wasn’t known before. The 1,400 6- to 8-year-olds in the study—including 941 with no exposure to secondhand smoke—were recruited from the Hong Kong Children Eye Study at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Eye Center. The children’s parents provided demographic information, including age, gender, BMI, birthweight and secondhand smoke exposure. The researchers measured the children’s choroids with swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Comparing the scans from children exposed to secondhand smoke with those from children with no secondhand smoke exposure, the researchers found that the choroids of exposed children were 6 to 8 micrometers thinner than those of unexposed children. And the more smokers there were in the family, the thinner the choroid was, the researchers found. What this means is: “parents (who smoke) should quit smoking to protect their children’s eyes,” Yam said. “Moreover, parents should prevent children from being exposed to secondhand smoking.”
There isn’t a lot of information on “how secondhand or even direct smoking in the pediatric population can affect visual pathways that are still developing until the age of 12,” said Dr. Erin Walsh, co-director of pediatric ophthalmology at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary at Mount Sinai in New York City. “This study attempts to link some of these unanswered questions,” Walsh said in an email. “It is an exciting and interesting study showing there may be anatomic changes that occur.”
The study would be stronger if it had specifically controlled for “some of the demographic and socioeconomic factors that can bias the results,” Walsh said. “One other interesting question would be whether or not these anatomic changes are reversible if smoking is removed from the household. Additionally, what would be the effect from alternative forms of nicotine inhalation, such as vaping.”